Hi all,

Q: How must the numbers returned by the atom property function 
"{selected_atom}.substructure" be translated into the corresponding 
secondary structure types?

The scripting documentation (13.0 and 13.2) contains this description:
------------
Used with select substructure=x, x can be either the quoted keyword 
"none", "turn", "sheet", "helixalpha", "dna", "rna", "carbohydrate", 
"helix310", or "helixpi", or the respective number 0-9. In the context 
{*}.substructure, the return value is a number; in the context label 
%[substructure], the return is one of the nine keywords. (Jmol 12.0)
------------

In Jmol 13.1.13 in the example '1DEH, chain A, residue 47' the number 
returned (=8) does not correspond to the position of the keyword 
'helixalpha' (=4 if counted from 1; =3 if counted from 0) which is 
reported by the label command.

For the for example residues below only three would fit into the keyword 
list from the documentation (0,2,7; if counted from 0):

   111.CA = 0 = none
     7.CA = 2 = sheet
   361.CA = 7 = helix310
    47.CA = 8 = helixalpha

Besides there are mentioned 10 numbers (0-9) but only nine keywords.

Regards,
Rolf

-- 

Rolf Huehne
Postdoc

Leibniz Institute for Age Research - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI)
Beutenbergstrasse 11
07745 Jena, Germany

Phone:   +49 3641 65 6205
Fax:     +49 3641 65 6210
E-Mail:  [email protected]
Website: http://www.fli-leibniz.de

           Scientific Director: Prof. Dr. K. Lenhard Rudolph
        Head of Administration: Dr. Daniele Barthel
Chairman of Board of Trustees: Dennys Klein

VAT No: DE 153 925 464
Register of Associations: No. 230296, Amtsgericht Jena
Tax Number: 162/141/08228


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to