Hi Amjad > (2) Is it possible to provide a more user-friendly javascript syntax for > JSmol that directly builds upon the Jmol syntax (which most of us are > familiar with and thus would make it easier to switch between the two > easily)?
Have you looked at the Jmol2.js library? It allows you to keep the classical syntax and internally converts it to the new one. http://wiki.jmol.org/index.php/JSmol#Conversion_using_the_Jmol2.js_.27ada pter.27_library I personally think it is better to move into applying the new syntax, though. There is also a bigger issue if you make a page that holds more than one Jmol Object. Then you must be more careful with the syntax and there are some differences in the way they are addressed now, but the object-oriented method of JSmol should be more easily managed in this cases. Finally don't forget that the new (JSmol) Jmol-JSO constructs also allow to use the Jmol Java applet. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT 3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
