when I use a command like:
print
({1.53}[1][17]).element.add("\t").add(({1.53}[1][17]).elemno).add("\t").add(({1.53}[1][17]).x).add("\t").add(({1.53}[1][17]).y).add("\t").add(({1.53}[1][17]).z)
result:
C 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
C 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
C 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
C 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
C 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
H 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
H 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
H 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
H 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
H 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
H 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
H 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
H 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
H 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
H 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
H 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
H 2.4705882 -0.08696627 -0.8534151 1.8308194
the atoms really are different, evidenced by C and H in the output or as
produced by:
print
({1.53}[1]).element.add("\t").add(({1.53}[1]).elemno).add("\t").add(({1.53}[1]).x).add("\t").add(({1.53}[1]).y).add("\t").add(({1.53}[1]).z)
result:
C 6 0.5630599 -1.1161811 1.47227
or:
print data({1.53},"xyz")
result:
17
C 0.56306 -1.11618 1.47227
C 0.57693 -2.34639 2.38065
C -0.82581 -0.78767 0.89831
C 1.22154 0.08281 2.15912
C -1.84993 -0.20657 1.87432
H 1.18245 -1.36436 0.61213
H 1.59096 -2.59017 2.67957
H 0.16333 -3.21266 1.87410
H 0.00023 -2.18628 3.28660
H 1.22370 0.95445 1.51206
H 2.25210 -0.14288 2.41288
H 0.71077 0.35029 3.07788
H -1.23407 -1.69083 0.45199
H -0.69344 -0.08274 0.08138
H -2.79985 -0.05883 1.37170
H -1.53391 0.75503 2.26115
H -2.02649 -0.86507 2.71782
I've tried other approaches to producing data with the "symbol, atno, x, y, z"
format, such as:
modnum = 15
atnum = 17
for (var i=0;i<atnum;i++) {
thisatom = "({1."+@modnum+"}["+@i+"])"
print
@thisatom.element.add("\t").add(thisatom.elemno).add("\t").add(thisatom.x).add("\t").add(thisatom.y).add("\t").add(thisatom.z)}
with and w/o @ on thisatom, with no joy; however:
print thisatom
in the for loop does return a series of 17 ({1.53}[i]) style atom expressions.
Hoping for new insight,
George Whitwell
NCWC Chemistry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
