well, then it is a caching problem on your end.-- refresh() now does a
10-ms delay itself. So there cannot be any difference between refresh and
delay 0.01. Check on your page
jmolApplet0._applet.viewer.eval.refresh.toString()
That should report:
"function
(a){this.chk||(this.viewer.setTainted(!0),this.viewer.requestRepaintAndWait("refresh
cmd"),this.isJS&&a&&this.doDelay(10))}"
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Jaime Prilusky <
jaime.prilu...@weizmann.ac.il> wrote:
> Besides, only using 'delay 0.1' instead of 'refresh' allows for the
> working message to appear at the expected times in the same overall
> structure. This is good enough for the purpose of keeping the user aware
> that something's going on.
>
> Jaim
>
--
Robert M. Hanson
Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.
-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
