On 05/12/2015 05:47 PM, Otis Rothenberger wrote:
> Bob,
>
> I guess I’m being a little dense on JSmol versions, but I’m still confused. 
> This link:
>
> http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/zip/jmol-14.3.13_2015.05.08.zip 
> <http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/zip/jmol-14.3.13_2015.05.08.zip>
>
> offers only a jsmol.zip file that unpacks as jmol-14.3.13_2015.05.07. That’s 
> the one with the potential bind problem, correct?
>
> In general, should the jmol version of a distribution have the same version 
> number as the version number of the jsmol.zip contained in the distribution 
> folder?
>
I noticed a similar difference for 'jmol-14.3.13_2015.04.17.zip' which 
says 'jmol-14.3.13_2015.04.16' in it's version info (and as timestamp 
'2015-04-17 13:59').

Regards,
Rolf
-- 

Rolf Huehne
Postdoc

Leibniz Institute for Age Research - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI)
Beutenbergstrasse 11
07745 Jena, Germany

Phone:   +49 3641 65 6205
Fax:     +49 3641 65 6210
E-Mail:  rhue...@fli-leibniz.de
Website: http://www.fli-leibniz.de

           Scientific Director: Prof. Dr. K. Lenhard Rudolph
        Head of Administration: Dr. Daniele Barthel
Chairman of Board of Trustees: Dennys Klein

VAT No: DE 153 925 464
Register of Associations: No. 230296, Amtsgericht Jena
Tax Number: 162/141/08228


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to