Sorry Bob,

After almost a month the problem is now gone. This has been a Post hoc ergo 
propter hoc confusion. This AJAX routine broke after a number of changes. My 
initial target was that it was the result of a SAN controller emergency that my 
provider had to deal with for a block of users. We were down for half a day. I 
talked to them after the fix, and they insisted that my problem just had to be 
a cross domain browser issue - not server issue. Now I’m thinking that there 
was a problem that was subsequently fixed. I have to write to them. They’re 
probably not going to believe it, and I don’t understand it either. Why would a 
page server create a problem with a client side AJAX call to PubChem? But 
here’s a fact. It was not broken at ISU - just CheMagic.

Anyway, the browsers I track seem to be happy with the PubChem routine again.

Otis

--
Otis Rothenberger
o...@chemagic.com
http://chemagic.com

> On Aug 31, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Otis Rothenberger <osrot...@chemagic.com> wrote:
> 
> Bob,
> 
> I wanted to do this directly (bypass Jmol) because I don’t want to use the 
> JSmol window. I’ve been using a JQuery AJAX call to do this, but this started 
> to fail recently. After doing some research, I saw that this was a common 
> problems because of browser problems. There are a number of solutions, 
> including a new browser standard - all convoluted as heck in my opinion.
> 
> Am I missing something here? In order to get that PubChem sdf directly into  
> a JavaScript variable, I need to use AJAX. Is this point correct?
> 
> There’s another possibility: JQuery has an app library for AJAX that 
> supposedly handles this problem $.ajax. Recently, I started using 
> JSmol.min.nojq. Is it possible that this is the origin of my problem - i.e. 
> Jmol JQuery uses the AJAX app?
> 
> I guess one solution would be to include a faceless Jmol applet to do this 
> dirty work for me. Is the faceless applet still an option?
> 
> Otis
> 
> --
> Otis Rothenberger
> o...@chemagic.com <mailto:o...@chemagic.com>
> http://chemagic.com
> 
>> On Aug 31, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Robert Hanson <hans...@stolaf.edu 
>> <mailto:hans...@stolaf.edu>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Otis Rothenberger <osrot...@chemagic.com 
>> <mailto:osrot...@chemagic.com>> wrote:
>> Bob,
>> 
>> Since the direct load of a model from PubChem works, PubChem must be 
>> allowing this with a proper Access-Control-Allow-Origin setting. I 
>> understand that.
>> 
>> On the JSmol client side, you still have to deal with the cross-origin AJAX 
>> problem to complete the load. Am I correct on this point?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> If so, how are you dealing with this AJAX problem?
>> 
>> 
>> nothing to do, since they use Access-Control-Allow-Origin  *
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> My problem is that I need the 2d sdf for the appended data, not the 
>> coordinates. I was getting this with regular AJAX via direct access, but 
>> this has changed in browsers recently because of tightening of the cross 
>> origin policy. Currently, I'm using my server as a proxy, but PubChem help 
>> techs say they really do not like the proxy approach.
>> 
>> 
>> I don't know what the  problem should be. Pretty sure if you use
>> 
>> 
>> data = Jmol.evaluateVar(jmolApplet0, "load(':caffeine')")  
>> 
>> 
>> you get it. Right?
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> Otis
>> 
>> --
>> Otis Rothenberger
>> o...@chemagic.com <mailto:o...@chemagic.com>
>> http://chemagic.com <http://chemagic.com/>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jmol-users mailing list
>> Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users 
>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Robert M. Hanson
>> Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
>> Chair, Department of Chemistry
>> St. Olaf College
>> Northfield, MN
>> http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr <http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr>
>> 
>> 
>> If nature does not answer first what we want,
>> it is better to take what answer we get. 
>> 
>> -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jmol-users mailing list
>> Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users 
>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Jmol-users mailing list
> Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to