Don't forget that there is a WebGL option with JSmol. See
http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmolgl.htm

There are many limitations, but it might work fine for simple applications.

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Paul PILLOT <paulpil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Eric,
> I’ve noticed the same problems, especially on older computers where each
> scene repaint can be perceived (white background flashing between each
> frame). One of my pages has other concerns related to javascript event
> listeners that make the whole experience even worse, by adding other
> calculations to the webpage on top of JSmol. My students noticed that
> firefox is better too.
> I have a simpler webpage with only buttons for interactions that doesn’t
> have the same drawbacks (animations are quirky, but user interactions are
> satisfactory).
>
> As this situation has been quite frustrating, I’ve decided to give WebGL a
> try using 3dmol.js. I am in the process of rewriting a single page
> application around a viewer, but it’s like reinventing the wheel as this
> library capabilities are far from being on par with JSmol and rely on a
> totally different mechanism of interaction (David Koes, its main
> developper, is very helpful in this process). Most Jsmol features lack form
> this library which focuses on rendering. I’ll see if it nonetheless could
> suit my teaching needs in biochemistry…
>
> -Paul
>
> Le 10-12-2015 à 17:55, Eric Martz <ema...@microbio.umass.edu> a écrit :
>
> In April 2014, Chrome gave the best performance of JSmol: smoothest
> rotation and few if any long (~ one minute) pauses during loading of some
> modest PDB files (pauses seen in Firefox). I configured FirstGlance in
> Jmol, when using JSmol, to recommend Chrome over Firefox. Safari was good.
> Internet Explorer was unusably slow with JSmol.
>
> Recently I began to notice jumpier rotation in Chrome, while Firefox and
> Safari continue to perform well.
>
> Today I found Chrome to be unable to rotate any molecule (even caffeine)
> in JSmol. Although there are brief moments when rotation can be seen, these
> are broken by long freezes (> 5 sec) when no rotation can be accomplished.
>
> The problem is worst when the mouse is moved quickly. The molecule freezes
> until the mouse is stopped. If you keep moving the mouse, the molecule may
> freeze for more than 10 sec. The molecule does rotate with very slow
> movements of the mouse.
>
> The problem occurs in OS X, where Chrome has updated to version 47.
>
> Rotation is still quite good in Chrome version 46, which happens to remain
> in my Windows 7 and 10 machines, despite version 47 becoming the stable
> release on December 1 (
> <http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2015-12-01T12:43:00-08:00&max-results=10>
> http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2015-12-01T12:43:00-08:00&max-results=10).
> Presumably my Windows Chrome will shortly auto-update to 47 and then I will
> be very curious about performance.
>
> I tested the OS X beta version of Chrome, version 48, in hopes the problem
> would be fixed -- but it remains in Chrome 48 in OS X.
>
> Since Chrome stopped supporting Java on September 1, 2015, Chrome is now
> useless for JSmol websites.
>
> We can hope this is a mouse-related bug in Chrome that will be fixed, but
> as I mentioned, a fix is not present in the current beta version 48.
>
> This is a sad turn of events! Comments? Suggestions? Insights?
>
> -Eric
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Jmol-users mailing list
> Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jmol-users mailing list
> Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
>
>


-- 
Robert M. Hanson
Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
Chair, Department of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr


If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.

-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to