Regarding strings, from what I experienced, getting a value from an array is a lot faster when the array is index based than when the array is associative (strings as indexes) Don’t know if that applies to your case... Paul
> Le 18-12-2015 à 15:15, Robert Hanson <hans...@stolaf.edu> a écrit : > > (the copy is the same as System.arraycopy -- it only copies references for > objects, but it copies scalars such as integers and floats.) > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Robert Hanson <hans...@stolaf.edu > <mailto:hans...@stolaf.edu>> wrote: > Oh, yes. .slice() copies all or part of an array. > > That's certainly a major improvement. Excellent. Jsmol is now using .slice() > exclusively when possible. > I suspect some of that fast processing time is due to this use. > > This is the kind of deep optimization that really have an effect. Great! > > How about strings? Any suggestions for boosting that hugely? > > Bob > > > > > -- > Robert M. Hanson > Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry > Chair, Department of Chemistry > St. Olaf College > Northfield, MN > http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr <http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr> > > > If nature does not answer first what we want, > it is better to take what answer we get. > > -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Jmol-users mailing list > Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
