Bob,
I’m going to define this global function in my Jmol Script:
function mfa(){x=[];n={*}.molecule.max;for (var i = 1;i <= n;
i++){x.push({molecule=i}.find("MF"))};return @x}
The function works and returns the array to JavaScript via Jmol.evaluateVar,
but it works with and without the @. Is there any preference or any difference
between these two expressions in this case?
Only tangentially related to this subject, I have a used
Jmol.getPropertyAsJavaObject in some of my JavaScript per your suggestions.
While it’s very neat, it does bring some object vs array confusion into the
JavaScript side. It’s not a big deal, but I just got hung up on .size vs
.length. In the case at hand, I’m replacing a Jmol.getPropertyAsJavaObject
approach to mf with Jmol.evaluateVar approach to mf.
Otis
--
Otis Rothenberger
o...@chemagic.org
http://chemagic.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San
Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries
present their vision of the future. This family event has something for
everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today.
http://sdm.link/attshape
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
