On May 25, 2015, at 3:08 AM, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 25/05/2015 10:43, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am reviving this thread to give you the final heads-up before moving on >> with removing the IIOP transport from the JMX RMI connector. >> >> If you have any objections it is the time to speak now. >> >> -JB- >> > Just to add to this. JDK 9 builds don't include the IIOP transport so that > the RMIConnector has only support the default transport since jdk9-b01. So > far then I don't think anyone has noticed, at least I'm not aware of any bug > reports. Since this is active development around changing the supported transports in Java 9, maybe this is an opportune moment for me to bring up a request I made early this year -- promoting the JMXMP transport from jmxremote_optional into the core? http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmx-dev/2015-January/000794.html Unlike IIOP, there is a clear use case where it is strictly superior to the default RMI transport (when you connect with a firewall or NAT between the application server and your workstation, or a virtual networking setup like Docker) I apologize for the thread hijack, but I didn't get any replies earlier, and it'd be fantastically useful IMO. Thanks, Steven
