The GitHub Actions job "Tests" on airflow.git has failed. Run started by GitHub user potiuk (triggered by potiuk).
Head commit for run: b78ac6188224def18e7f441b34b05c2e7f58bdbe / Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> Include plugins in the architecture diagrams When it comes to access and management plugins management follows different pattern than DAG files. While DAG files can (and should) be modified by DAG authors, the whole idea of Plugins was to make it only possible to modify plugins folder (and installl plugin-enabled packages) by the Deploymenet Managers, not DAG authors. The difference is quite important because even in a simplest installation, airflow webserver never needs to access DAG files, while it should be able to access plugins. This is even more profound in the environment (leading in the future to multi-tenant deployments) plugins are not 'per-tenant" - they must be installed and managed by deployment manager, because those plugins can be used by Airflow Webservers. In the future we might want to make distinction between these two different types of plugins, because theorethically it would be possible to distingquish "scheduler, worker & triggerer" plugins from the "webserver" plugins - however we do not have such disctinction today and whoever manages plugins folder is impacting both webserver and workers. Report URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/7371027839 With regards, GitHub Actions via GitBox --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
