Hontvari Jozsef wrote: >If I take the overlap (using the Interval.overlap function, each value >were displayed using toString) between >2004-10-31T00:00:00.000/2005-10-31T00:00:00.000 (ISOChronology[UTC]) >and >2005-06-04T00:00:00.000/2006-06-30T00:00:00.000 (ISOChronology[UTC]) >then the result is >2005-06-04T02:00:00.000/2005-10-31T01:00:00.000 >(ISOChronology[Europe/Prague]) > >Notice the time part is different then both originals! Maybe I don't >understand something but this doesn't seem to be a correct result. >The problem is obviously related to the timezones, the overlap function >creates a new Interval, but using a constructor with null chronology >which is not the same as the chronology used in the original intervals. > > This was a bug. It has been fixed in SVN now.
Stephen Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Joda-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
