Hi,
During testing I have found that ISODateTimeFormat parsing isn't quite 
as expected:

Currently the following will all parse:
2006-06-01
2006-06-1
2006-6-01
2006-6-1

Only the first is a correct ISO format.
Similar problems affect time parsing and the basic formats.

Should this be changed so only the first of the four parses?
Or is this too radical a change now?

Stephen

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Joda-interest mailing list
Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest

Reply via email to