The JSR-310 codebase is considerably richer in functionality, and is the main one I work on. However, it isn't yet complete and code will change (methods/classes will disappear and change).
For production usage as of today, Joda-Time is the only option unless you can live with the frequent changes above. I particularly don't want open source projects depending on a pre-1.0 JSR-310. Stephen On 14 July 2010 09:52, Ian McCall <i...@astirion.com> wrote: > Hi. > > I'm a bit behind, I didn't realise there were active binary implementations > of JSR-310 available. If I'm starting a new codebase now, which would be > better to go for, the JSR-310 or the JodaTime libraries? > > > > Ian > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first > _______________________________________________ > Joda-interest mailing list > Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Joda-interest mailing list Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
