Well there is a major release version coming up... That would be an
appropriate time to make a breaking change, no?
James
On 4 Feb 2011 23:43, "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote:
> On 4 February 2011 23:39, Viktor Hedefalk <hedef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I guess the most obvious backwards compatability issue would be if
>> someone had implemented his own DateTimeParser. Hopefully that
>> shouldn't be too common though, it's really just an internal
>> interface, right?
>
> Unfortunately, no. I have encouraged users to implement this interface
> to solve some formatting issues. Thus I can't change it. Nor would I
> want to create a DateTimeParser2.
>
> Stephen
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
> and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical
server's
> connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
> rules translate into the virtual world?
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
> _______________________________________________
> Joda-interest mailing list
> Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's
connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
rules translate into the virtual world?
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
_______________________________________________
Joda-interest mailing list
Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
