This was mentioned at the start of the project, but they seem to be very rarely used. I wouldn't want to add it to Joda-Time core (although I would accept minor tweaks to Joda-Time that made an external projects job easier in creating recurrences).
The http://code.google.com/p/google-rfc-2445/ project contains some of this. Stephen On 30 September 2011 10:27, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@scalaris.com> wrote: > Hi, > > reading ISO8601 I can see the definition of recurring time intervals e.g. > "Rn/PnYnMnDTnHnMnS". Comparing with joda-time 2.0, it seems that neither the > ISO formatters do support it nor is there currently any direct concept for > repeated periods (e.g. number of repetitions as part of the Period or > Duration data). > > Is something like this planned or has someone already modeled this on top of > the existing code base? > > Cheers, > Jörg > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 > _______________________________________________ > Joda-interest mailing list > Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Joda-interest mailing list Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
