Yes there is a difference. Joda-Time is correct and SimpleDateFormat is wrong.
0.91 is 91/100th of a second, which is 910ms
Stephen
On 9 March 2012 10:29, Wojtek K <w...@kite-fu.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is there a difference between DateTimeFormatter and SimpleDateFormat
> in respect of parsing milliseconds? This is my test code:
>
> String pattern = "yyyyMMddHHmmssSS";
>
> SimpleDateFormat javaDateFormatter = new SimpleDateFormat(pattern);
> DateTimeFormatter jodaDateFormatter = DateTimeFormat.forPattern(pattern);
>
> String tsStr = "2012.03.07.17.15.07.91".replace(".", "");
>
> // SimpleDateFormatwill parse 91 as 91ms, Joda 2.0 will parse it as 910ms
> Date javaDate = javaDateFormatter.parse(tsStr);
> Date jodaDate = jodaDateFormatter.parseDateTime(tsStr).toDate();
> assertThat(jodaDate.getTime() - 910 + 91, equalTo(javaDate.getTime()));
>
> Regards
> Wojtek
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> _______________________________________________
> Joda-interest mailing list
> Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Joda-interest mailing list
Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
