Robert,
We have also considerered using the connection pooling of
Enhydra for Jonas, but it is still to work out.
Let us know what you work out.
Christophe Ney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enhydra Project http://www.enhydra.org
Lutris Technologies http://www.lutris.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe Durieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Robert Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, October 29, 1999 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: using third party connection pooling
>Robert Krueger wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> has anyone considered using a third party (more advanced) connection
>> pooling package with JOnAS? I'm thinking of using the free bitmechanic
>> jdbcpool classes and would like to know what JOnAS people think of that.
>> It has all of the features I would like to see in JOnAS
>> (connection-timeouts, max usage etc.).
>>
>> It works as yet another jdbc-driver when the pools have been configured.
>> so my thoughts are. Provided it follows JDBC transaction semantics (the
>> underlying connections are not changed in the middle of an open
>> transaction) it should just work, shouldn't it?
>>
>> would like to hear people's thought's. if I'm not missing anything it
>> should be quite possible to integrate that into the JOnAS codebase with
>> little work. Of course, for this to work there would be some more
>> environment properties for the datasource (timeout etc.).
>>
>> what do others think?
>>
>I'm a little sceptical about having a pool above and under the JDBC
interface.
>I'm not sure this could work, but if you can try, I'm interested with the
result.
>A best approach should be to implement the missing features directly in
jonas.
>We didn't have time to do it until now unfortunatly, since putting jonas on
CVS
>took a lot of our time.
>
> Philippe
>--
>Philippe Durieux ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Bull S.A - 1 rue de Provence - 38432 Echirolles Cedex France
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-frec.bull.com
>-> Download our EJBServer at http://www.bullsoft.com/ejb <-
>
