Sean Johnson wrote:
> > After these discussions, it seems to me while the issues I raised can be
> > overcome, these issues are currently not addressed by the EJB
> > architecture.
>
> I think that statement is overreaching. It is fair to say load balancing
> and intelligent load balancing are not addressed "out-of-the-box" by
> the current version of JOnAS. It is not fair to say these issues are
> not addressed by other vendors implementation of the EJB architecture.
>
> It is fair to say that the intelligent load balancing you desire
> could be implemented very, very easily on the current version of JOnAS.
Yup, I completely agree with you.
Btw, You misunderstood what I said. I was saying that issues like
load-balancing were not addressed by Sun's EJB specification but left for the
vendors to work out themselves.
This signals the EJB specification is not mature and a lot of places still
need improvements. Yup, technologies evolve. It's a good thing.
(This reminds me how the vendors and developers struggled with the imcomplete
BOA spec in Corba for years and, eventually, BOA was superseded by a more
thorough POA spec.)
--
John
----
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
include in the body of the message "unsubscribe jonas-users".
For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
include in the body of the message "help".
