Some days ago I proposed to let GenIC produce code to bind a SQL_DATE to java.util.date. I thought this to be a good idea, but now I have doubt. Please mind this: An EB is not more than the persistency tier. In that role, it has to reflect the persistency layer. For EJB 1.1 only knows of JDBC as persistency technology, a date is always a java.sql.Date. So, if the application uses java.util.Date, it should be the job of a wrapping SB to cast the java.sql.Date of the EB to a java.util.Data on beside of the application interface. The question is, if EJB 2.0 also only knows of JDBC as a persistence technology; if not, there should be a clearing at the community: For the EB should hide the underlying technology, then it HAS to hide the java.sql.Date. What do you think? Is there any statement given in the specs? ---- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "unsubscribe jonas-users". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
