Don't we need to max pool size to prevent the pool from growing like crazy?
Or is it a real risk.
For the name, I just keep in mind that data binding frameworks map foo-bar to FooBar.
But this doesn't matter :)
christophe
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Philippe Durieux
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:45 PM
To: Christophe Ney
Cc: 'Cyrille Morvan'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: new DTD JOnAS 2.4
Christophe Ney wrote:
>
> I like the new names,
> I understand that there is no need for a min-cache-size,
> But why don't we have a max-pool-size ?
> christophe
The need is for scalability, to limit the number of instances in memory.
max-cache-size is used for this.
Why should we have a max-pool-size then ?
We could also name these values:
max-number-of-instances-in-memory and min-number-of-instances-in-memory
:-)
The goal was to have short names: poolmin and cachemax but may be it's
not a good idea.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
>Behalf Of Philippe Durieux
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:19 PM
> To: Cyrille Morvan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: new DTD JOnAS 2.4
>
> Cyrille Morvan wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the new DTD jonas-ejb in CVS, for a "jonas-entity",
> > the names "poolmin" and "cachemax" don't look nice for me.
> > Why don't you use "min-pool-size" and "max-pool-size" ?
> >
> > or "poolmin" and "poolmax"
> > or "cachemin" and "cachemax" ?
> >
> > Link to the new DTD :
> >
>http://cvs.objectweb.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/jonas/src/org/objectweb/jonas_ejb/deployment/jonas-ejb-jar.dtd?rev=1.7&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=Jonas
> >
> > --
> > Cyrille Morvan
> > http://www.ingenosya.com/jonas_opentool.php3
> >
> > ----
> > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > include in the body of the message "unsubscribe jonas-users".
> > For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > include in the body of the message "help".
> The reason is that the min is for the pool of available instances,
> and the max is for all instances, most of them being part of the
> active cache of instances currently used. So the min and the max
> are not for the same thing.
> We could choice: min-pool-size and max-cache-size if everybody
> agree. I personnally don't mind.
> --
> Philippe Durieux ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Bull - 1 rue de Provence - 38432 Echirolles Cedex France
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -> Download our EJBServer at http://www.evidian.com/ejb <-
> ----
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> include in the body of the message "unsubscribe jonas-users".
> For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> include in the body of the message "help".
>
> ----
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> include in the body of the message "unsubscribe jonas-users".
> For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> include in the body of the message "help".
--
Philippe Durieux ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bull - 1 rue de Provence - 38432 Echirolles Cedex France
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> Download our EJBServer at http://www.evidian.com/ejb <-
----
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
include in the body of the message "unsubscribe jonas-users".
For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
include in the body of the message "help".
----
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
include in the body of the message "unsubscribe jonas-users".
For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
include in the body of the message "help".
