Well, since it is not mandatory in EJB 2.0, it's really not too late. :-) The problem 
is, from my point of view, I could imagine that in a next spec, let's say EJB 3.0, 
this could become mandatory. I suppose this because if they would not intend to act 
this way, they would not tell in detail how to do this, since it would be hard to find 
a vendor that implements this just as good will. From my point of view, the "not 
mandatory" means here: "not mandatory NOW".

We should keep this in mind, I could imagine that interoperability becomes a central 
point in the next version of the spec, and it's good to know what's coming up before 
it's there.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Container-Interoperability (04-Okt-2001 13:34)
From:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> I took a look to the chapter 19 from the EJB 2.0 specs. Interoperability 
> becomes
> a true concern (it's not too late ;) ).
> It seems that interoperability is not mandatory. But if the vendor wants to 
> be
> interoperable it has to implement what's described in this chapter.
> 
> Just to sum up:
>     - RMI/IIOP 1.2 is required.
>     - Serializable EJB utility objects (Handles, Iterator, Collection) must 
> use
> HandleDelegate class (spi).
>     - Transaction context must conform to the CosTransaction::
> PropagationContext
>     - Transactions are coordinated at the client side TransactionManager.
> (interesting for some clustering functions!)
>     - Naming must be COSNaming compliant.
>     - Security is built on top IIOP over SSL.
>     - Security principal is derived from the connection identity.
> 
> Regis
> 
> On 04 Oct 2001 09:41:44 UT
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I just found this document describing the interoperability between EJB 2.0
> > containers. Seems that EJB 2.0 / J2EE 1.3 makes it mandatory for containers
> > that the protocol of the interposition classes is standardized, basing on
> > IIOP:
> > 
> > http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.3/techdocs/release/ReleaseNotes.html#15815
> > 
> > ----
> > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > include in the body of the message "unsubscribe jonas-users".
> > For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > include in the body of the message "help".
> 
> ----
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> include in the body of the message "unsubscribe jonas-users".
> For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> include in the body of the message "help".
> 
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

----
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
include in the body of the message "unsubscribe jonas-users".
For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to