[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 9/26/01 4:55:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Rev. Vince wrote: > > ...In that we have reached a point where a discussion of > > historical fact leads to charges of my being > > vehemently anti-Catholic then whatever I am doing > > here is not doing any good, > > I did not receive Rev. Vince's post from which this is quoted, but the > feeling I get from this statement is that he is (or was) a member of this > list to serve some sort of pastoral function, either to preach to us or to > educate us about religion, specifically his view of religion, then he was on > the wrong list.
As you are being your usual, sympathetic self Paul, let me explain. You need not have read the entire post to comment on it, but what part of "discussion of historical facts" do you not understand? He was not preaching, not educating about religion, but of history. Correcting facts. Something you do all the time on this list. And the fact that he IS an ordained priest of the Catholic Church means he is an authority on the subject whose opinions on a discussed topic are more than educated. Jerry
