Jan wrote > > (snip) > > Fans of numerologically related happenings are positively soiling themselves > > with glee today. Well, at least the ones that use the US method of writing > > dates - not everyone does it the US way. Anyway, although the following > > palindrome has probably already appeared somewhere in your local paper, here > > it is >>> > > > > 20:02, 02-20-2002
A big deal was made of this here yesterday, too. But it's slightly different. "Our" time/date was depicted as: 20:02 20/02/2002 Which still works, and is in fact repeating 2002 three times, which hasn't happened (in that format) since the year 1001, when I doubt they were taking much notice, and certainly weren't working from a 24-hour clock! Hell
