thanks for the clarification. after all it was admiral rickhover who help start the "anti nuke" campaign---------so i guess not all admirals are bad. later gene ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:53 AM Subject: Re: more new nukes (njc)
> In a message dated 3/21/02 11:34:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > explains retired Rear Adm. Eugene Carroll. > >"Whereas these people say, 'Well, this new weapon is so little, and we > >canapply it so precisely, and it's for such a specific purpose that nobody > >canbelieve that we're being irresponsible or careless or radical in our use > >of such a wonderful little weapon.' > > > >HOLLY MACKEREL!!!! SUFFERIN SUCCOTASH!!! Did he really say "wonderful > >little weapon?" Well better get started digging my bunker and hiding my > >joni cd's. Thanks Fred. later gene > > Actually, Adm. Carroll is paraphrasing (disparagingly) what the current > thinking is in the Pentagon; he clearly doesn't agree. > > But don't stop digging. > > Fred
