> > dsk offered: > > > > > How about Michael Foot? Don't know what he looks like though. > > >
I opined: > > I was thinking either Neil Kinnock who succeeded Foot in 1983 or John > > Smith > > who succeeded Kinnock in 1992, I am leaning towards Kinnock. for my > > answer > > Vince > > dsk's historically accurate reply: > > > I think Neil Kinnock got the leadership of the Labor Party because the > party as led by Michael Foot lost so badly in 1983, but I may be wrong > about that. > No, you wouldn't be wrong on that! And Smith succeeded Kinnock for Kinnock's losing the the 1992 election so badly. and the circle, it goes round and round Vince
