Who to believe?

Here is the IAEA's chronology of "Nuclear capabilities of Iraq"  dated
1991-1992 which details some of the very nuclear weapons-making materials
outlined by Bush that the NY Times (presumably where Alterman borrows his
proof) recently cast doubt upon.

http://www.iaea.org/worldatom/Press/Booklets/Iraq/event.html

Here are statements regarding Iraq's development of nuclear weapons from the
former director of the IAEA, Hans Blix dating back to 1991:

http://www.iaea.or.at/worldatom/Press/Statements/FormerDG/dgsp1991n05.html

Statement by IAEA Director General Hans Blix on IAEA inspections in Iraq to
the US House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
inspections in Iraq to the US House of Representatives Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence

Washington, D.C., USA

23 October 1991

[Excerpts]

"The deep secrecy in which Iraq conducted a massive nuclear weapons
development and production programme the extent of which we are still trying
to determine dramatically demonstrates the Agency's need for intelligence
information in the future.

In Resolution 687, which gave the IAEA unique rights, we were asked:

To carry out immediate on site inspections to determine Iraq's nuclear
capability;

To develop a plan for the destruction, removal or rendering harmless of
nuclear related items which Iraq was not permitted to retain; and

To develop a plan for future ongoing monitoring and verification of Iraq's
compliance with its obligations in the nuclear area under the Security
Council's resolutions. These tasks have proven to be much larger, more
complex and considerably more dramatic than we first expected, even though
the IAEA has decades of on site inspections expertise, as well as state of
the art equipment and laboratories in our Agency or at our command.

The IAEA has conducted seven inspections in Iraq. They clearly show that
Iraq blatantly violated its sworn pledges to not seek to develop or acquire
nuclear weapons. This information was not disclosed by Iraq as it agreed to
do under the terms of the cease fire, but was offered grudgingly when
offered at all, only after inspectors had uncovered the existence of
previously undeclared activities. And let me say that we are not at all
confident that everything has been revealed, even now."

Reply via email to