[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi Sarah!
>     I really don't think the anger comes because of people who occasionally
> forget.  I think the hostility comes when members decide that their own
> political beliefs must be heard by all, and these posts are even prefaced
> with something like "I realize this is NJC, but it's an issue that concerns
> us all etc., etc."

Hmm. Maybe I'm missing something. I've read probably ten
thousand posts, and only recall this happening a couple of times.

I have certainly forgotten to add njc a few times myself.
Anything that is dependant on memory is...is....well I forget..

Having to label Joni Content as jc is still a memory dependant
thing, and when people forget, the joni onlies will not get that
post. I think the system in place is the best one, and doesn't
need to be changed.

Mags N Brei wrote:

> we are here for a reason, to discuss the life , music and art and everything
> else related to Joni MItchell.

I'm not so sure about that. Maybe the list began that way, but
it has morphed into something more. Those that want to discuss
nothing but Joni have the option of being on Joni Only.I
thouroughly enjoy the discussions about other topics including the
music of other artists, politics, etc. If I don't like it, or don't care,
I DELETE.
I'm sure I'm not the only one here who feels that the jmdl is
like a family. A family of kindred souls who have in common a
deep love of the music of JM. I would feel it a great loss if the
list were censored or discussions were limited to certain subjects
because a few listers were pissed about receiving NJC material.
Ironically, they are the ones that will not read this post because
it is NJC.
If those people would just politely remind those that forget the
njc tag, ...to......uh.....forgot again...
RR

Reply via email to