Michael wrote:
> Unfortunately this would require either a constitutional >amendment or
simultaneous legislation in 48 states, and >since many (particularly
mid-sized swing states such as >Missouri) would lose influence under such a
> scheme, it seems rather unlikely.
Great point - ANY change to the current EC system would require a
constitutional amendment.
> Still not a bad idea...
The best one I've seen as far as coming the closest to making everyone
happy. Although there will always be some people who are not happy, no
matter what!
Kakki
