Vince opined:

<<It [the Republican Party] was founded to assert federal soverignity over 
the states and to free the slaves.>>

I agree with the gist of your chronology, Vince, but this statement calls for 
elaboration.  The Republican party was formed, primarily, to oppose *the 
expansion of slavery* into the new Western Territories under the 
Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.  The act provided that the question of slavery 
in the proposed territories of Kansas and Nebraska would be left to the 
residents of each territory.  This enraged many because it repealed the 
Compromise of 1820, which banned slavery in that area.  

The Republican Party was organized as an answer to the divided politics, 
political turmoil, arguments and internal division, particularly over the 
Kansas-Nebraska Act and slavery, that plagued the many existing political 
parties in the United States in 1854. The new party's platform was opposed to 
the expansion of slavery in the Territories under the act, to be sure, but 
did not endeavor to "free the slaves." 

I split hairs on the distinction because opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska 
act, the primary impetus for the formation of the Republican party, was not 
based solely on the abolitionist cause.  For instance, staunchly democratic 
Southern Illinois was angered at the act because residents feared that 
opening Kansas to slaveholders would prevent the settlement of small farmers 
like themselves.  Violently negrophobic, voters in this section wanted 
nothing to do with abolitionism.  Others who would become Republicans were 
hostile to Kansas-Nebraska, but had no desire to see that opposition 
translated into the general anti-slavery movement.

The Free Soil Party, asserting that all had a natural right to the soil, 
demanded that the government re-evaluate homesteading legislation and grant 
land to settlers free of charge.  The Conscience Whigs, the "radical" faction 
of the Whig Party in the North, alienated themselves from their Southern 
counterparts by adopting an anti-slavery expansion position. All these 
groups, which had been marching under different banners, became Republicans. 

-Julius

Reply via email to