Debra wrote:
> I wasn't talking about you, Kakki. I was talking about >Reagan and Bush,
Sr followers and I don't know, don't care >and it's none of my business
whether you are or are not in >that group.
I'll try not to be argumentative. Your post seemed to be responding to my
post and was copied to me so I thought it was. I apologize if I
misunderstood.
> You did not know what the original Republican philosophy was. Your guesses
about it were incorrect.
Whoa, according to whom?? Nevermind, it doesn't matter.
I did know about that philosophy and wrote about it.
> On this issue, how can you think we said the same thing? And what does it
matter whether we did or not?
I thought we said the same thing about Lincoln, but if you say you didn't
that's fine with me and I'll assume my interpretation was wrong.
> P.S. The word "spin" nowadays has very negative >connotations. I merely
express my opinions. There's no >reason for me to use yours in order to get
my point
> across, except to sometimes disagree and explain why. >Twisting, spinning?
No, not my style; if anything, I am >annoyingly straightforward.
Again, I'm sorry I came across negatively in my post and that I
misunderstood the intent of your post. I'm glad you think "spin" is very
negative.
Kakki
