I really should be working and not carrying on about
labor (the irony amuses me, though) ...
Kakki wrote:
> Bottom line is that Chavez should have been denied
> for valid reasons and not chased out before she even
> had a chance to state her case. Everyone should be
> allowed that in our system.
I agree with the last statement completely, and with
the first to an extent. It doesn't seem like Chavez
had much of a chance. Otoh, in the current political
climate, she should have known better and should have
laid all the facts on the table as soon as she had an
inkling that she was going to be nominiated. By doing
otherwise, Chavez did herself in.
> Actually I think it has already happened - believe
> it or not, I was surprised that the Republicans
> couldn't come up with anyone more impressive than
> Bush and that the Democrats couldn't come up with
> anyone more impressive than Gore.
Both Bush and Gore are lame bulbs. Each side has
called the other side's candidate a "puppet," and each
side is correct. I suspect there are smarter and
perhaps more frightening minds behind the curtains, in
both parties. (Cheneys scare the heck out of me.)
> All the low-down nastiness is turning away some
> probably stellar candidates.
No doubt that's true. Sad, isn't it?
Lori
in DC
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
http://photos.yahoo.com/
