dear mark,
the answer to your question is NO. do you know what they do at rolling
stone? they take a look at the lyrics and underline two or three portions
that will prove that the artist is either: the new [place name here] or an
asshole. then they look at the credits and check out the guest musicians.
finally they play the album and take notes so that it will look like they've
actually ANALYZED the music and lyrics, but they're only trying to locate
the guest musicians [if any] and the lyrics they've read. then they write
the review, putting all these things together, and it looks as if they know
what they're talking about.
wallyK, former subscriber
-----Mensaje original-----
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Mark or
Travis
Enviado el: Domingo, 05 de Agosto de 2001 03:16 p.m.
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: Today's Articles: August 5
The Rolling Stone. Was it ever really worth paying attention to?
Mark in Seattle
