Hmm. Is it just me or we have three threads of this? Four if we count the Internet2 one.
Anyway, I came up with a solution for the standard NAT64's performance. Branch is issue251-trex-performance: https://github.com/NICMx/Jool/tree/issue251-trex-performance Details on the commit message. We'll see how it goes. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Alberto Leiva <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW I discussed the hypothesis and some workarounds in the other thread. > Maybe I should have done it here. Oh well: https://mail-lists.nic.mx/ > pipermail/jool-list/2017-September/000143.html > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Alberto Leiva <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks for the compliments! :) >> >> > It will probably be in the weekend or early next week, but: of course! >> >> Okay, I'll get more testing done in the meantime. >> >> And hopefully find a solution to improve the standard NAT64's performance >> too. >> >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Sander Steffann <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> > @Sander: can you do some load testing with this? It would be nice to >>> see >>> > some numbers. >>> >>> It will probably be in the weekend or early next week, but: of course! >>> Sander >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Jool-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail-lists.nic.mx/listas/listinfo/jool-list
