On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 12:45 -0600, Alberto Leiva wrote: > > Will try to create a new OpenWRT VM.
I am using OpenWRT on a router. It would be non-trivial to try to replace that with an OpenWRT VM. > - Does your translator have a route towards 1.1.1.1? Yes. From a dual-stack node in the same network as the IPv6-only node where both have the OpenWRT/jool router as their default gateway: $ ping 1.1.1.1 PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=30.7 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=29.4 ms Or maybe to put it more clearly, if I add an IPv4 address to the node that failing to reach 64:ff9b::1.1.1.1 and then ping 1.1.1.1, it works, so the OpenWRT translator node certainly has a path to 1.1.1.1. > (Can you ping > both 2001:123:ab:123:16da:e9ff:fe48:f99e and 1.1.1.1 from the > translator when Jool isn't modprobed?) Yes. > - Is Jool printing something in dmesg? Nothing other than it's: NAT64 Jool: NAT64 Jool v3.5.6.0 module inserted. when loading the module. Does the jool kernel module have any option/ability to print debugging messages about what it's doing? Cheers, b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Jool-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail-lists.nic.mx/listas/listinfo/jool-list
