Hi Kunal,

 

Please read RFC8683.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8683/

 

 

In short. If you only use NAT64 *you need DNS64*, otherwise, there is no 
“automatic” synthesis of the A records into AAAA records so IPv6-only hosts or 
apps can access IPv4-only services on the other side. If the synthesis is not 
done, the NAT64 prefix will not be used, and consequently the NAT64 will not be 
used either.

 

With NAT64 and DNS64, literal addresses and old-APIs aren’t working. DNSSEC may 
be broken if validated by the end servers.

 

If your scenario is using 464XLAT, the DNS64 is optional (you do more 
translations on the CLAT but is not a big issue).

 

With 464XLAT literal addresses, old-APIs will work and DNSSEC has more chances 
to work (will worl always if you don’t use DNS64).

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 14/6/20 12:19, "Jool-list en nombre de Kunal Chauhan" 
<[email protected] en nombre de [email protected]> escribió:

 

Hi Team,

 

As far as I know NAT 64 to convert the IPv6 address to IPv4 address .

Still some point need to clear.

 

1. Is DNS64  will introduce the same concepts? as NAT64.

2. In NAT64 concept where  DNS64 fits .

 


 

-- 

Thanks with Regards!

kunal

 

_______________________________________________ Jool-list mailing list 
[email protected] https://mail-lists.nic.mx/listas/listinfo/jool-list 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

_______________________________________________
Jool-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail-lists.nic.mx/listas/listinfo/jool-list

Reply via email to