On Wed, 2022-03-16 at 17:38 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Not sure why are arguing with the author.
Who is arguing? I am trying to understand. Part of understanding and learning is asking questions about how and why things are done. > But, they aren't all available, because we can't share a port with > NAT44. And there is exactly the answer to the question I was asking. Not being a kernel hacker, I was not aware of this. So if ports cannot be shared with NAT44, are the range of ports that jool does use somehow reserved so that NAT44 doesn't tromp on them? I never did get an answer to why: # jool -i ilinx bib display --tcp --numeric Error: The kernel module returned error 3: This namespace lacks an instance named 'ilinx'. which kind of stopped the troubleshooting dead in it's tracks. Do I still have the syntax wrong in some way? Cheers, b. _______________________________________________ Jool-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail-lists.nic.mx/listas/listinfo/jool-list
