Thanks again. On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Lukas Eder <[email protected]> wrote:
> My hint was meant only for the first syntax. You cannot set Field<?> as a > value on a Record. You can see from the API that this is not possible. >
Thanks again. On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Lukas Eder <[email protected]> wrote:
> My hint was meant only for the first syntax. You cannot set Field<?> as a > value on a Record. You can see from the API that this is not possible. >