> Let's take a look at your example. If i understand you correctly, > there is one database with two schemata (that's what the SchemaMapping > functionality does, right?).
That's exactly what it's for. > Even if you choose another approach than the FactoryRegistry one, i > think the general idea should still be to delegate everything to the > client code, for the simple reason that all those implementation > details should be outside the scope of the jOOQ project, just as the > creation of the initial JDBC connection is now. Yes, because I really have better things to do, too :-) OK, I got it now. I think I may find some solution in the near future, about how to find a relevant registry instance.
