That makes sense for Result. I don't see how this makes sense in Record, though. A typo?
Cheers Lukas 2011/5/17 FractalizeR <fractali...@yandex.ru>: > Hello. > > Can you please add isEmpty() method to classes like Jooq Record? Currently > I'm checking if there are any records in result by testing > > result.getNumberOfRecords() < 1 > > I could call > > result.getRecords.isEmpty() > > but that's also not very convenient. I think isEmpty() follows Principle of > least astonishment >
