Hi Lukas > How's the general experience you're making with that integration? Is there > any functionality missing, or some room for improvement?
We just started using jOOQ and haven't tested all needed cases yet. The library is very flexible. We sacrifice some of the type safety by not using generics. > For instance, I can see that you're using named parameters, which is a Spring > feature, not a JDBC one. Is the current jOOQ API suited for this use-case, or > is there potential for improvement, such as a Factory.param(String > parameterName) method? We use Factory.literal method for this in conditions. Maxim
