Hi,
thank you!
I've see the code, you're right, but....
I think that is my mistake but i've extended DefaultGeneratorStrategy like
this.
....blablabla...
/**
* Override this method to define how your Java classes and Java files
* should be named. This example applies no custom setting and uses
* CamelCase versions instead
*/
@Override
public String *getJavaClassName(Definition definition, Mode mode)* {
*String str = super.getJavaClassName(definition, mode);
if (mode == Mode.POJO) {
str += "Pojo";
}
return str;*
}
----bla bla bla------
i've see the generated code and the pojo java name is *xxxPojo.java*,
right. But the class name definition into the file remains the old one
(without "*Pojo*" suffix).
I've see the class DefaultGenerator and - at row *810* - it uses
out.print(*strategy.getJavaClassName(table)*)
without *Mode* parameter. It calls *GeneratorStrategyWrapper*, *not* my *
CustomGeneratorStartegy*.
Is it right? If yes, could you explain me how to set my custom name into
code-class definition?
Thank you again and sorry for my stupid questions.
Agharta
Il giorno martedì 20 marzo 2012 16:44:22 UTC+1, Lukas Eder ha scritto:
>
> Hello Agharta,
>
> Please consider this section from the manual:
> http://www.jooq.org/manual/META/AdvancedConfiguration/
>
> It explains how you can customize generated artefacts.
>
> Cheers
> Lukas
>
> 2012/3/20 Agharta agharta
> > Hi again,
> >
> > A suggestion: because tables names and pojos class names are the same
> > (TABLE NAME = Customer.java, POJO NAME = Customer.java), a suffix in
> > Table classes or Pojo classes is suggested.
> >
> > As records (CustomerRecord.java), i suggest to modify pojo base class
> > name. Example CustomerObject.java or whatever you want.
> >
> > This is suggested because, if i use pojo classes and table classes in
> > same file, one of they is fully referenced in code (not beautiful to
> > see) and not easy to see and manage (possibility to confuse names
> > during code typing).
> >
> > I can suggest a parameter into code generator xml
> >
> > <generate>
> > ......
> > <pojos>true</pojos>
> > <pojos-suffix-name>Object</pojos-suffix-name>
> > ......
> > </generate>
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you again.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Agharta
>
>
