One option is to look into something like - http://javalee.sourceforge.net/ - http://minuteproject.wikispaces.com/JOOQ
These are code generators with more flexibility about their input/output models. It would mean more work for you, though. Cheers Lukas 2012/4/26 Andreas <[email protected]>: > I knew I have read somewhere something about this! > > Thanks for the links. Until you, or someone else, found time to implement > this, I have to stick to my solution. Except someone else has an idea. > > Cheers, > Andreas > > > On Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:45:51 AM UTC+2, Lukas Eder wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> > Is there a possibility to let jOOQ generate the classes without having a >> > connection to a database server? For example by supplying a definition >> > file? >> >> This has been requested before by Sergey Epik: >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jooq-user/4-iZMVDtkGA/pKInJF5HYxIJ >> >> It is an open feature request on the roadmap: >> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/jooq/ticket/875 >> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/jooq/ticket/911 >> >> The idea is to generate the jOOQ-generated artefacts in two steps: >> >> 1. generate XML from the real schema >> 2. generate Java code from XML >> >> The XML could then be checked in. >> >> > This works, but isn't very elegant. Most of the time someone forgets to >> > update the H2 script when the MySQL schema changes and breaks the build. >> > >> > Is there a more elegant solution? (I don't want to check-in the >> > generated >> > jOOQ classes). >> >> Currently, I'm not aware of a more elegant solution. But maybe someone >> else on this group has solved this problem? >> >> Cheers >> Lukas
