> I've used #3 (over #2) and it was a substancial improvement.

Yes, I can confirm that

> In any case, I will have a look at #4 in our current environment and tell
> you what are the results.

Great. If I'm right with my second finding, then I'll apply your
patch, rather than implementing #4

> p.s.: i'll be at your JUGS talk :)

Perfect! So you can make some advertising, once again :-)

Cheers
Lukas

Reply via email to