Hello, >> If you wish to provide an initial contribution, that would be very >> nice. > > Understood. I'll take a look at the SQLite implementation and start > tinkering.
The SQLite implementation may be a good choice as it is probably one of the simplest ones, even if it doesn't really have any real information_schema. What you'll need first, is a way to reverse-engineer schema information from your Firebird database. I found this website here: http://www.alberton.info/firebird_sql_meta_info.html You may find even better ones. Another option is to implement #1636 https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/1636 This would allow for arbitrary database dialects to be supported by jooq-meta, and thus by jooq-codegen, if their JDBC drivers sufficiently implement the JDBC DatabaseMetaData API (which is rarely the case, unfortunately). > Should i ask questions about the implementation details in this group or the > jOOQ-developer group? I had been thinking about closing the developer group, as it doesn't get a lot of traction. As long as discussions stay within a few threads, I guess it is OK to use the user-group. In fact, it would be interesting for the public to see how new databases can be supported. Maybe other users will have input and hints for general improvements. > OK. Is there a way to send you my contact info privately? > (Just in case i can be of assistance when you attempt the installation > again...) I have yours, if it is the one you use to send mails to this group? Cheers and good luck! :-) Lukas
