Yes, why not. That would make the API a bit more consistent. There are already similar methods around: http://www.jooq.org/javadoc/latest/org/jooq/Cursor.html#fetchOneInto(java.lang.Class)
Registered as #1984: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/1984 2012/11/26 Ryan How <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > I'd probably just implement this myself, but it means setting up the jooq > project so I can hack the source... > > Anyway, I reckon .fetchOneInto() to match the fetchInto() would be really > handy. I find myself either calling fetchOne(), then checking for null, then > calling .into() or calling fetchInto(), then if size > 0 .get(0). Hope that > makes sense :). > > What you do think? > > Thanks, Ryan >
