Hi Roger,
> I think I now know the issue here - the problem is with the way that eclipse
> lists in it's proposal window for import statements. It does not seem able
> to handle having 2 options that only differ in case ('Table' for the class
> and 'table' for the package) so I missed the case issue and ended up
> importing 'table' instead of 'Table'.
I see. Hmm, I don't seem to have this issue though...
> Something else I now come across in the docs that may not be as clear as it
> could is as follows - or I could be getting it all wrong(again).
>
> In section "4.4.10 Date and time functions" a number of available functions
> are listed, I hit 2 issues
>
> a) In the docs there is no clear example for how they are used.
> b) The SQL functions are listed, which do not have the same case or
> layout as the Java functions.
You're probably right. All the manual's functions pages are the same:
http://www.jooq.org/doc/2.6/manual/sql-building/column-expressions/numeric-functions/
http://www.jooq.org/doc/2.6/manual/sql-building/column-expressions/bitwise-functions/
http://www.jooq.org/doc/2.6/manual/sql-building/column-expressions/string-functions/
http://www.jooq.org/doc/2.6/manual/sql-building/column-expressions/date-and-time-functions/
I guess it wouldn't hurt to add actual jOOQ examples to illustrate
their use, though. I have registered #2005 for this:
https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/2005
> One nice thing to report is that all your logging seems to work fine with
> the log4j 2.0 betas
Good to know!
Cheers
Lukas
