> I guess if you add all the _simple_ features in a "SimpleNamingStrategy" > (having "Simple" in the name will be important *lol* ) it will be obvious to > people that it will cover only the most basic use cases and you will not > raise a maintenance nightmare :-) > > This should satisfy 98% of all jOOQ users with very little work required. > > What you think?
Feel free to contribute a "SimpleNamingStrategy" :-) (including a simple JAXB configuration that works both with the standalone code generator and with Maven)
