On Monday, February 25, 2013 4:39:40 PM UTC-5, Lukas Eder wrote: > > > Yes, you're right. I'm still struggling with this Maven myself, so I hear > you. I'll add a section to the manual explaining how to build jOOQ: > https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/2270 > > >> Once I got the jars working I ran the PGobject test and things work now!! >> So thank you again. >> > > Good to know! I'll merge this fix downstream, then, to 2.6.4 and 2.7, for > those users that aren't ready to migrate to jOOQ 3.0 yet. > > Please tell me if you run into any other issues / corner-cases. As you > said yourself, jOOQ shouldn't "touch" any bind values that are passed in as > Object/OTHER. That was the original intention, but of course, there is a > lot of potential for bugs in this area, as there are few integration tests > covering these "unexpected" types. > > Happy to help.
Are there specific test corner cases that you need tests for? I have been writing jOOQ snippets here and there for my own testing.... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
