2013/3/28 Peter Ertl <[email protected]>: >> I'll think about your "fix". I still prefer a generic solution, but I can >> see how yours eases some pain, immediately. > > I would not consider it a 'fix' but a pragmatic solution for quite a common > usecase. > > The usecase would be even more common when this entry-level obstacle ("name > clash") would be easier to solve.
I agree with the majority of opinions on this user group, that an easy way to add prefixes will be well-received. Using packages for the distinction of the same object generated from various generators (jOOQ's, Hibernate's, etc.) is insufficient, as only one of the various copies can be imported at a time. Unfortunately, Java doesn't have any local imports like Scala, or aliased imports like Scala or Ceylon. > Also it would not stand against a generic solution but be an option. Precisely. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
